Taking a look through my daily email is an exercise in frustration at the best of times. Even after filtering out all the spam for Viagra, multi-level marketing scams, and direct messages from Twitter peeps telling me how to add 5,000 followers in 1 week, I’m still left with a raft of communication to wade through and filter for relevancy.
Not surprisingly, I deal with work issues first and following that, if there’s any time left in the day, I’ll take a look at my subscription email. This is stuff that at some point in time, I’ve felt was worthy of my limited attention and that I’ve consciously invited into my inbox.
So, if you’re trying to sell me something, you’d call that a pretty warm lead. You might want to take a little time to make sure you’re talking to me about something I’m actually interested in even. Logically, that would probably result in the best ROI on each piece of communication sent – win/win for everyone. Right?
Well, for many of these companies, logic doesn’t seem to apply. Even after I’ve signed up for information on one product I’m still getting promotional messaging for another completely unrelated product, for which I’m not even remotely interested. And they should know that already, because I told them!
Note to all email marketers – your audience does NOT want to receive an ongoing stream of undifferentiated messages targeted at the masses. They expect you to know them – even just a little.
According to Forrester Research “The top reason for unsubscribing from marketing messages was irrelevance: An overwhelming 74% of consumers unsubscribe for this reason.”
Mike Weston from email marketing specialist Lyris recently posted a great article on the 8 building blocks of email relevance. He talks about relevance existing in four dimensions: “The right message, to the right person, at the right time, in the right channel.”
So it’s not as easy as just acquiring an email address and permission to communicate. You need to cover off a lot more bases or risk losing these potential customers through what can only be described as indifference to their specific, and stated needs.
Imagine your wife taking the time to tell you about the new perfume she really likes, only for you to deliver a power-tool for her birthday. Even if she likes power tools, this is unlikely to go down particularly well for you. If a customer volunteers information (any information) then it makes sense to use it. If you fail to personalise communication based on the information you already have, they won’t bother handing over any more. Ignore it for long enough, and they’ll start ignoring you.
Email marketing is a place where lazy direct marketers flourished for awhile. Why? Because the cost of sending out a campaign was so much lower than the traditional fold and post version of direct marketing, they sank to playing a numbers game. The cost of sending more and more stuff into the ether simply wasn’t a barrier. Even working on ever decreasing return ratios it was getting the job done.
Perhaps tellingly, Nigerian scammers use the same technique to good effect – but it’s hardly an approach that’s going to build an enduring customer relationship.
It’s been said that direct marketing is experiencing a renaissance in the digital age. That's not because we can mass market more efficiently. It's because we can now personalise advertising to individuals cost effectively.
So before you hit the send button, make sure you’ve done everything in your power to be relevant to every single person about to receive your message.
If you haven’t – you’re wasting their time.